#Xbench personal checklists for free#
#Xbench personal checklists software#
#Xbench personal checklists trial#
#Xbench personal checklists free#

The community reported cases of unlocalized text embedded in graphics, violated character limits and non-resizable text which both resulted in truncations, grammatical issues with gender and so on.

Availability of quality translation service providersĪ few years ago, issues caused by miscommunicated expectations and process details between the development, design and localization teams emerged here and there in many games.

The number of potential users speaking the language and their paying capacity.

Publicly available research, such as insights on the game’s localization ROI.

The experience of your main competitors, including the popularity of their games in the country of your interest.

When selecting the target languages, consider the following: Ekaterina Zaitseva, lead localization manager of RJ Games says that “we don’t translate game descriptions a few days before release in the App Store now. But even in this case, and even though the promotion team might also have the final say, it is recommended that marketing and analytics teams - in collaboration with localizers - make a general decision on what languages the game needs to be present in. It's simply replace the characters with question marks.A game might be developed and published by different companies. So if you work on a language that isn't ascii-based, then Xbench won't work for you.

#Xbench personal checklists free#

On top of that, the free version doesn't support unicode.

#Xbench personal checklists software#

I recommend paying for the commercial version, if you find the program useful: Xbench is an excellent program, good software doesn't come out of thin air, and developers should be rewarded for their efforts. the main one is that it won't be updated, so if (for example) SDL in the future makes a change to the sdxliff format that makes it no longer compatible with Xbench, you'll be out of luck. There are some other limitations in the 'free forever' version. 3, so it is not available in the free version. 2.9 for the QA of Studio files, but not, (for example), of memoQ files: that capability was added after the release of v.

#Xbench personal checklists trial#

That's not exactly right: Version 3 (the commercial version) is free for a trial period, then you have to pay, or it stops working - but version 2.9 is free forever.

#Xbench personal checklists for free#

You can use it for free for a while, but then you are asked to pay. You can find a thorough presentation of what Xbench can do for translation QA and terminology management in this presentation of mine: Xbench for Terminology Management and Translation QA ▲ Collapse I highly recommend it (and not only the free version, which is starting to be a bit outdated: the paid version as well). Xbench is a terrific program, it includes excellent documentation (via the help file), and, if you devote to it the time necessary to learn to use it well, can be very useful for your projects. Just like any other useful non-trivial piece of software, you have to devote the time necessary to learn it. Is it as simple to learn as my client says it is? No, there is a learning curve.two consecutive same words, like the two to's I've just used, inconsistencies in source or target, etc.): it also includes a more practical spell-checker, and can be expanded (via personal checklists) to catch the kind of errors you know you might be particularly prone to. Xbench not only helps to catch the type of errors that is difficult for a human being to to detect (e.g. Would you recommend it to improve quality of your work? Yes, absolutely.Do you use it with every project? Almost every project: the sole exception are a few small 'one-off' projects.Do you like it? Yes, very much: it's wonderful tool, not only for QA, but also for terminology and translation memory management.I own a licence for Xbench, but have never really warmed to its QA functions. Also, if they are one of those clients that insist I work with SDL Studio projects, even though I have asked them politely and insistently if I can use my own CAT tool, I let them handle all the QA stuff in Studio. I currently us the various QA features in Déjà Vu X3. Having said that, the more my client pays me, the more time and effort I can expend on QA stuff. The party line: Yes, it's great, and I use it, and all manner of other QA tools on my transaltiomn work after finishing it.Ī perhaps more realistic version: I usually don't have much time for that kind of thing once I'm finished, and I am actually quite slow and methodical in my work anyway, so hope for the best I am referring specifically to the free version.ĭo you like it? Do you use it with every project? Would you recommend it to improve quality of your work? Is it as simple to learn as my clients says it is? Now, I generally feel I have had enough of new softwares to get to know and use, so I would like your input, please, if you use Xbench as a quality assurance tool. A client has asked me to get and use Xbench for QA of files translated in Trados Studio.